Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phys Ther ; 103(10)2023 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37410384

RESUMO

Leaders and scholars from multiple academies of the American Physical Therapy Association are developing and defining movement system diagnoses to guide practice. However, there is no consensus on the need for or content of such frameworks. This Perspective describes current thought about movement system diagnoses in physical therapy and summarizes the work of the Academy of Geriatrics (APTA Geriatrics) Movement System Diagnosis Task Force (GMS-TF) as it contributes to the movement system diagnosis discussion within the profession. Initially convened to define movement system diagnostic labels unique to older adults, the GMS-TF's developmental process identified the need for a clearer diagnostic framework onto which specific diagnoses will later be added. Although The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health model is a strong foundation for the patient-client management model, the GMS-TF proposes formal incorporation of the Geriatric 5Ms (mobility, medications, memory, multi-complexity, and "what matters most") into a movement system framework for older adults. The GMS-TF concurs with the APTA Academy of Neurology Movement System Task Force proposal that observation and analysis of key functional tasks are the foundation of any examination of older adults. The GMS-TF suggests adding several additional movement tasks that are important for older adults. The GMS-TF believes that this strategy highlights the health care needs of older adults and prioritizes physical therapist care for older adults with complex needs. This Perspective is the foundation for a future movement system diagnosis model for older adults that will complement and facilitate the development of models of care to be applied across the lifespan.

2.
Int J Low Extrem Wounds ; 20(3): 232-235, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32223354

RESUMO

The traditional Total Contact Cast (TCC) is considered the gold standard for treating plantar diabetic ulcers. A number of prefabricated TCC kits have been introduced, which offer a user-friendly casting process for health care providers. Our objective was to evaluate pressure reduction and gait characteristics after application of a TCC kit (TCC-EZ) and traditional TCC. Fifteen individuals (9 males, 6 females; median age of 51.5 years [range = 40.5-71.2 years]) completed 30-m walking trials while fitted with TCC-EZ and TCC in a randomized order. A pair of automated wireless photogate sensors captured time to traverse the distance and pedobarographic insoles measured and recorded plantar pressures. Paired t tests were used to compare peak pressure, gait speed, and cast weights across the 2 modalities. Peak pressure and cast weight were significantly lower in the TCC-EZ arm (169.6 ± 41.3 kPa vs 214.9 ± 63.2 kPa, P = .0048; and 1.79 ± 0.17 kg vs 2.11 ± 0.25 kg, P = .0004). Contact area and gait speed were not significantly different between the 2 modalities (140.4 ± 25.8 cm2 vs 126.9 ± 37.8 cm2, P = .0228, Cohen's d = 0.40; and 0.94 ± 0.19 m/s vs 0.83 ± 0.26 m/s, P = .0532, Cohen's d = .48). TCC-EZ was found to provide more favorable pressure distributions compared with TCC. TCC-EZ is also lighter and may be a preferred treatment modality for patients. More research is necessary to reveal the clinical effectiveness of prefabricated total contact kits.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético , Neuropatias Diabéticas , Adulto , Idoso , Moldes Cirúrgicos , Pé Diabético/terapia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sapatos , Caminhada
3.
Rehabil Nurs ; 45(5): 271-278, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730382

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to ascertain whether ba-duan-jin (BDJ) can improve balance and enhance the quality of life among older adults. DESIGN: This pilot study was designed as a single group pre-post comparison test. METHODS: Sixteen older adults were qualified and recruited for this study at local retirement communities. Assessments for pre- and postintervention among the subjects included Single-Leg Stance, Chair Rising Test, Tinetti Balance Test, Modified Falls Efficacy Scale, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Questionnaire for quality of life. FINDINGS: After 12 weeks of BDJ training, significant improvements were identified in Single-Leg Stance, Tinetti Balance Test, Modified Falls Efficacy Scale, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (all p < .01); however not for the Chair Rising Test (p > .05). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that BDJ can improve balance, lower extremity strength, quality of life, and decrease fear of falling among older adults. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: BDJ is an effective rehabilitation training method and can improve balance and motor function among older people. Rehabilitation nursing plays a key role in functional rehabilitation of older people.


Assuntos
Equilíbrio Postural/fisiologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Postura Sentada , Tai Chi Chuan/normas , Acidentes por Quedas/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Projetos Piloto , Tai Chi Chuan/métodos
4.
Rehabil Nurs ; 42(2): 109-116, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26497836

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify the differences in the limits of stability (LOS) between older rolling walker and single-tip-cane users. DESIGN: This was a matched paired t-test design with repeated measure. METHODS: Eighteen older subjects were matched based on age, gender, and functional level. The subjects were assessed using the multidirectional reach test initially and 5-month later in four directions: forward, backward, leftward, and rightward. FINDINGS: Initially, there were no differences between cane users and rolling walker users in the LOS in all directions. However, 5-month later, the cane users who held their canes in their right hand had significantly better stability in forward and rightward reach than the walker users (p < .05). Further, the walker users demonstrated significantly decreased functional reach in forward reach (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Cane users might have better stability than walker users in the forward direction and in the direction toward the side holding the cane. This study may provide guide for clinicians including nurses for selecting appropriate rehabilitative interventions for older adults using walkers and canes.


Assuntos
Bengala/normas , Equilíbrio Postural/fisiologia , Andadores/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermagem em Reabilitação/métodos , Caminhada/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...